Exoplanet Travel Planner Calculator

Calculate travel time to an exoplanet at various spacecraft speeds, accounting for relativistic time dilation effects.

TRAVEL TIME
--
Earth Time
--
Ship Time
--
Lorentz Factor
--
Kinetic Energy
--

Interstellar Travel

Traveling to exoplanets presents enormous challenges due to vast distances. The nearest star, Proxima Centauri, is 4.24 light-years away. At 10% of light speed, the trip takes over 42 years. At current spacecraft speeds (~0.006% c), it would take 70,000+ years. Relativistic time dilation means crew members age less than Earth observers at high speeds.

At 90% of c, the Lorentz factor is 2.29, so crew ages only 44% as much as Earth observers. The kinetic energy required scales dramatically with speed, making even 10% c extremely energy-intensive. A 100-ton ship at 10% c requires about 4.5 x 10^19 joules, comparable to months of US energy consumption.

Formulas

t_Earth = d/v | gamma = 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) | t_Ship = t_Earth/gamma

Nearest Stars

StarDistance (ly)Time at 10%c
Proxima Centauri4.2442.4 yr
Barnard's Star5.9659.6 yr
TRAPPIST-139.6396 yr
Kepler-442120612,060 yr

FAQ

What propulsion could reach 10% c?

Proposals include nuclear pulse propulsion, fusion drives, antimatter engines, and laser-pushed light sails. Breakthrough Starshot aims to accelerate gram-scale probes to 20% c using ground-based lasers, reaching Alpha Centauri in about 20 years.

Does time really slow down?

Yes. Time dilation is experimentally confirmed via atomic clocks on aircraft and GPS satellites. At 87% c (gamma=2), crew ages at half the rate of Earth observers, potentially allowing distant stars to be reached within a human lifetime aboard ship.

How much fuel is needed?

The rocket equation makes high-speed travel extremely fuel-intensive. To reach 10% c with chemical rockets would require a fuel mass billions of times the payload mass. Nuclear or antimatter propulsion could reduce this dramatically but remains far beyond current technology.